Do Nokia users like Nokia 2.2
What do you think ? Is mediatek helio A22 sufficient to use until 2021.
Do Nokia users like Nokia 2.2
What do you think ? Is mediatek helio A22 sufficient to use until 2021. Personally I do feel that 6999/- is a good price if someone wants regular updates and don't want to spend more 💰 money😉
1
Categories
- 29K All Categories
- 24.5K Phones
- 15 Nokia 3.4
- 4 Nokia 2.4
- 59 Nokia 8.3 5G
- 116 Nokia 5.3
- 6 Nokia 1.3
- 96 Nokia 2.3
- 964 Nokia 7.2
- 169 Nokia 6.2
- 419 Nokia 9 PureView
- 124 Nokia 2.2
- 1.4K Nokia 8.1
- 842 Nokia 7.1
- 4.5K Nokia 6.1 Plus
- 1.9K Nokia 5.1 Plus
- 2.1K Nokia 7 plus
- 327 Nokia 8 Sirocco
- 1.4K Nokia 8
- 2.1K Nokia 6.1
- 2K Nokia 6
- 222 Nokia 5.1
- 1.2K Nokia 5
- 168 Nokia 4.2
- 83 Nokia 3.2
- 733 Nokia 3.1 Plus
- 276 Nokia 3.1
- 959 Nokia 3
- 204 Nokia 2.1
- 516 Nokia 2
- 56 Nokia 1 Plus
- 270 Nokia 1
- 47 Nokia X7
- 487 Feature Phones
- 10 Nokia 5310
- 11 Nokia 800 tough
- 17 Nokia 2720 Flip
- 4 Nokia 110
- 1 Nokia 105
- 7 Nokia 220 4G
- 4 Nokia 210
- 77 Nokia 3310 3G
- 263 Nokia 8110 4G
- 378 All phones
- 2.8K General
- 13 Home of Nokia Phones
- 19 Announcements
- 2 Tutorials
- 74 All about Community
- 6 Rules & Guidelines
- 380 Community Feedback
- 162 Contest & Activities
- 19 Global Contests
- 3 Q&A's
- 34 #ShotOnNokia Challenges
- 771 Ideas
- 570 Anything goes
- 3.1K Tech talk
- 53 Software and Specs
- 2.1K Beta labs
- 302 Beta labs
- 204 Android Developer Preview
- 174 India
Comments
Hello,As per specification missing Qualcomm chipset will make slight disappointing but still this chipset is quite good to go.also with 2/3GB variants at that price sounds pretty good for a Entry level Android One device. Even for Games Like PUBG also play well which is Good Option.In all Aspect It's good for buying.
It is another overpriced Nokia phone. Better buy Nokia 5.1 Plus at ₹7999 during offers. Dual rear camera, full glass back, Mediatek Helio P60. Will last you to 2021 or even more if you want to.
Don't buy Nokia 2.2, it may receive updates but the processor won't be able to handle the heavy OS updates and will face lags in future.
Make it less buggy.
Check Nokia 3.2 price on amazon. It is already available for Rs.9999 for 3+32 which is lower than the price mentioned on Nokia's own website.
The problem is Chinese brands have ruined the mentality of ours. We think every phone to be overpriced if it is priced higher than the Chinese smartphones. This is not true. It also depends on the user's needs. Not everyone wants to play pubg or heavy games on their phones. Nokia 5.1 plus is old and hence they give massive discounts during sales just for stock clearance.
Nokia 2.2 is a good phone for a basic user. The price will automatically go down in a few weeks.
Nokia 5.1 Plus ---> ₹7999/- During offers
Nokia 2.2 ---> ₹6999/- (Introductory Price, which will eventually become permanent)
A comparison between Nokia 5.1 Plus, Nokia 4.2, Nokia 2.2
Also consider that this phone is targeted at the offline customers and not online. Now compare the specs of this phone with phones available in the offline segment. You will start noticing its value. 😊
Nokia 5.1 Plus a year old device still better at everything at almost the same price.
As for your offline market argument, yes you are right. In offline market, it can be a good buy.
The argument of Nokia 2.2 selling in the offline segment is the only argument I can agree with you.
Just tell me one thing @Kartik Gada what makes Nokia 2.2 a better choice to you other than being a latest phone (as for the launch date) ???????
A older device with its current pricing if a better choice than the latest one, I would buy that than having a phone which I am confirm to face lags in the future.
@singhnsk HMD's strategy is just launching new products rather than launching products which are more consumer centric. In India, if NOKIA bring devices at better prices with better specs, companies like Xiaomi,Realme doesn't stand a chance. People will buy Nokia devices without any 2nd thoughts because of the trust on Nokia. But this thing is what Nokia fails to understand.
Nokia 5.1 plus is good and I never denied it. Also, it is priced at 10999 for 3+32 model on Flipkart. So, I don't know why would a person considering to buy a phone worth 7k spend 11k and buy a 5.1 plus. Now coming to offers, they come once in a while and I think people keep waiting for the offers to buy new devices. If that was the case then shops would remain closed for all other days and only open during the festive season.
For me, Nokia 2.2 is the perfect low-end device that HMD has produced till now. This ticks most marketing boxes which people are crazy about. Comes with a small notch at a budget, gets face unlock (fast or not but people are crazy about it), Google assistant button (I am not a fan of this but it is definitely a unique feature and only Nokia 2.2 has it), colourful back panels with glossy design which looks a lot refreshing when compared to similarly priced devices from Mi and others that are available in offline market. Nokia 2.2 will be 1st to get Android Q. Now, you might say that this will affect the performance but I don't think one major update will degrade it to an extent where the phone becomes unusable.
You will buy an older device with better specs. It is you. Not everyone is same na. Nokia 5.1 plus's design pales when I compare it to the Nokia 2.2, 3.2 and 4.2 from the front. And why would one buy an older device which is available at a discount? There are latest devices available online with better specs at competitive prices.
Nokia 5.1 plus available at ₹7999 always during sales (Sales are always once in a month, sometimes twice, call it stock clearance still a better wiser buy)
1. Xiaomi
2. Samsung
3. Vivo
4. Oppo
5. Realme
Out of these top 5, only two brands focus on selling devices online at extremely low prices. Xiaomi stands at no.1 and realme stands at no.5. Rest three brands in between focus mostly on offline markets and their pricing is more or less similar or sometimes even higher than the pricing of Nokia smartphones.
Xiaomi can fight with price as due to their different model of earning revenue. The more devices they sell the more ads they show to the users. This generates more revenue for them.
Samsung till recently was just fighting with their brand name which isn't enough and they realised it. Hence, launched the M Series with aggressive pricing. Still not aggressive as Mi but they will sell their devices once again just because of their brand name and offline push.
The BOTTOM three are all from the same parent company, BBK. Vivo and Oppo focus on offline market and if you look at their specs and build you will notice in some areas Nokia devices offer a better value. But their sales team is capable of pushing their devices with those fancy camera features. Realme is new and we will have to see how it prices their phones in the long run.
So, just selling devices at aggressive pricing is not enough. You cannot make losses as a company runs on profits. All phones sold offline are priced higher. Even the Xioami ones are priced higher. HMD doesn't have deep pockets like Samsung, Vivo, Oppo and Xiaomi so they have to be careful with every decision they make.
Btw, Realme flash sales are better and more frequent than Xiaomi (for which you mentioned out of stocks in secnds). Also, Realme devices available in offline realme stores at the price shown above. Buy a device readily available, that's a valid argument. Buy a device readily available but can't wait for a better device at better price. I disagree.
Oppo Reno 10x zoom camera, a very good camera, Snapdragon 855 at under 40k.
It is the Oppo and Vivo that brings true innovation to smartphones these days.
Vivo and Oppo are quite good with the pricing now. They understood the Indian market.
You are looking from a consumer point of view and I am trying to show you the company side.
I just hope that we have the old Nokia back like we used to have with better pricing and specs. I would love that.